AUTHOR: Nicole Comeau

Fire code officials

The question of the day: what is the NFPA Electrical Inspectors Section (EIS)?

NFPA’s commitment to electrical safety has not wavered since our founding in 1896. Over the last 125 years, we have supported many different stakeholder groups (architects, contractors, designers, engineers, first responders, and inspectors, to name a few!), each with a unique role and different objectives, but all with the shared bond of a commitment to the elimination of death, injury, property, and economic loss due to fire, electrical, and other related hazards. A brief history of the NFPA Electrical Inspectors Section (EIS) We are continually learning about how people work and what they want from NFPA. One thing we heard loud and clear from the electrical inspection community several years ago was a stated need for a unified voice in the code making process, in advocating for the use and enforcement of current codes, in receiving top-notch training, and for support in keeping communities safer. As a result, we leveraged our existing and successful membership and member section model to create a space solely for that community—the NFPA Electrical Inspectors Section. Membership in the Electrical Inspector Section is open to any NFPA member who is directly employed by or contracted to a public agency that promulgates and/or enforces codes and standards and performs one or more of the following activities: field electrical inspections, electrical plans review, or administration/supervision of personnel performing field electrical inspections and/or plans review. To be clear, you can join the section if you are a combination inspector (multi-hat) or building official, as long as you meet the criteria noted.   Help us design the future As the global pandemic’s hold on our business loosens and we hear more from those involved with electrical inspections, we have renewed our focus on how our membership offerings, tools, and solutions can best enable the code compliance function in jurisdictions around the world.  If you are a current member of NFPA, we encourage you to join the section and to help us continue to build the community—we anticipate making substantive enhancements in response to changing conditions and also in response to your direct inputs.  If you are not a member of NFPA but have thoughts on what NFPA can do to support the unique needs of those involved with electrical inspections, we’d love to hear from you—send your thoughts by email to electricalinspectors@nfpa.org (or if you want to talk to someone, let us know that in the email and include your contact information).  We encourage all of you to stay tuned for information as we develop offerings for you. Build important connections While we know how important it is to preserve your independent voice, we also know how important achieving compliance through collaboration is to you—you need to work with people in many roles who have varying degrees of understanding of the National Electrical Code® and how its requirements are applied. NFPA has member sections in support of these other groups, and we believe that collaborating across relevant sections is the perfect way to work together while ensuring that electrical inspection interests retain an independent voice. Our current structure supports the best-of-both-worlds approach that you need to be successful. Access to valuable NFPA resources Whether you are or aren’t a member of NFPA, we’d like to remind you of two benefits we provide to all AHJs in support of your important work: Free Technical Question Service. NFPA allows AHJs/Public Sector Officials to utilize this service to receive one-on-one help with technical standards questions. Enforcer Funding Program. NFPA provides funding for Technical Committee (“Committee”) participation for certain public sector Committee members who have been designated by the NFPA Standards Council, for purposes of committee balance, in the category of “Enforcing Authority (E)” (“Enforcers”). The Program will provide reimbursement for the reasonable and necessary Covered Expenses actually incurred in connection with attendance at the NFPA Technical Committee meetings commonly referred to as the First Draft meeting and the Second Draft meeting (“the Covered Meeting” or “Meeting.”). For the National Electrical Code project, volunteers are called panel members and meetings are called panel meetings – the Enforcer Fund applies equally to panel members and panel meetings We also support the needs of all stakeholders by making all of our codes and standards available to read online for free. (This is how you can get to the free version of NFPA 78, Guide on Electrical Inspections.) Our regional operations team in the field can support you as well. As a global, self-funded nonprofit organization, we are continually talking to stakeholders and evaluating what we deliver to you, and how we deliver it. Historically, we gave many of our tools and solutions (code books and training, for example) to others for delivery to you. At this point in time, we strongly believe that both you and NFPA will benefit from more personal relationships and a more direct delivery of services and solutions to help you do your job. As we look to deepen these relationships and to work together to solve shared problems, we encourage you to share your thoughts with us at electricalinspectors@nfpa.org. We look forward to hearing from you!
Los Angeles

Following an Explosion at a Cannabis-Related Business in Los Angeles, Records Indicate No Inspections Conducted at Facility

Keeping communities safe from fire, electrical, and other related hazards isn't something that just happens—it's the result of having a fully functioning Fire & Life Safety Ecosystem.  When any one component fails, consequences can be catastrophic.  In the case of the May 16, 2020 explosion at a downtown Los Angeles cannabis-related business (Smoke Tokes), 11 firefighters were injured—and the outcome could have been much, much worse.  What I have read about the event since it happened illustrates breakdowns in the Ecosystem, and in Los Angeles there is already movement afoot to close some of those gaps.  A recent article in the Los Angeles Times, “LAFD has no record of inspecting downtown building that exploded in May,” highlights the failure of the “Code Compliance” Ecosystem component and is tied to how having a trained workforce could have helped avoid this outcome. Ecosystem Component: Code Compliance Keeping buildings in compliance with codes is a two-way street.  Building owners, facility managers, and tenants share a responsibility for keeping buildings and businesses safe on a day-to-day basis.  Authorities Having Jurisdiction (AHJs) are responsible for ensuring that buildings are in compliance by performing inspections, often at prescribed intervals.  In the case of Smoke Tokes, the Los Angeles Fire Department had no record of ever inspecting the business, despite the fact that the property was listed in the department's Fire Prevention Database.  According to Fire Chief Ralph M. Terrazas, the business required an annual inspection, and if it had been inspected, it is likely that the large quantities of hazardous materials (butane and nitrous oxide) would have been seized.  That said, if the building had been inspected before these chemicals were brought in or stored in dangerous quantities, an inspection wouldn't have changed this outcome.  Because inspections are a snapshot in time, having a skilled workforce is an equally critical component in terms of helping drive safety on an ongoing basis.  Ecosystem Component: Skilled Workforce  As my colleague, Meghan Housewright, wrote in her June blog, "Fire & Life Safety Ecosystem: Skillsets are Incomplete Without Key Safety Component," … “A skilled worker who overlooks safety is not a skilled worker.” Building owners and facility managers play a vital role in ensuring that the buildings they own and manage are safe.  Understanding fire and life safety requirements for maintaining safe buildings is a key (and often overlooked) piece of knowledge that people need to do their job. For example, they need to understand what type of activity tenants are engaged in and whether that activity is allowed based on the building's occupancy classification and protection features to ensure the proper safety systems are in place.  Beyond that, tenants need to understand safety requirements around the storage and use of products that they sell or need as part of doing business, among many other things.  If people don't know the requirements, it is unlikely that they are aware of risks, and even less likely that they actively work to mitigate them.  So many of these tragic events are preventable—but only if people are aware of and manage risk.   Using the Ecosystem as a Framework  The Fire & Life Safety Ecosystem is a valuable tool to help you identify opportunities to work differently to improve community safety.  Finding and closing Ecosystem gaps proactively is a great way to reduce risk, and it's equally important to learn from Ecosystem failures.  In Los Angeles, Chief Terrazas responded swiftly, ordering “a citywide audit of businesses that store and sell volatile materials. As of August 30, the department had conducted 328 investigations of such businesses and identified 108 that had not previously been in the city's fire prevention database, Terrazas said. The department also issued 64 fire violation notices and ordered 12 businesses shuttered for various safety violations, records provided by the department show.”  The cannabis market is expanding quickly as more and more states pass legislation to legalize its growth and use.  As new businesses enter the market, sometimes safety is overlooked and/or not well-understood.  NFPA has responded to the unique fire safety needs related to the growth and extraction of cannabis, adding an entire new chapter, Chapter 38, to the 2018 edition of NFPA 1, Fire Code.  Many jurisdictions use this chapter to amend their state or local fire code to increase safety related to these processes.  Additionally, we have a host of resources available online and invite you to share your experience about the safety issues you are facing on NFPA's dedicated cannabis research webpage.  We at NFPA are working tirelessly to ensure that everyone involved in the cannabis industry, regardless of where they fit in the Ecosystem, understand the risks and respond responsibly.  Many people think that “it” can't happen to them.  It can and it does.  A great first step to make sure it doesn't is to understand the hazards and risks, and to work proactively and collaboratively to mitigate them.  IT'S A BIG WORLD. LET'S PROTECT IT TOGETHER.  

Implementing Remote Video Inspections: 12 Key Lessons

Up until last month, conversation around Remote Video Inspections (RVI) was limited and sporadic. Discussions were mainly about work on our developing standard or with AHJs looking to drive efficiency in their often resource-strapped departments. The current pandemic, its associated push to remote work, and the requirement of social distancing have combined to thrust RVIs into the forefront of AHJ minds everywhere. It's rare for a day to go by without at least one story about a jurisdiction implementing RVIs showing up in my news alerts, and recently one of those stories was about a great partner of NFPA, Tim Mikloiche. Tim is the Building Official/Supervisor of Inspections in West Hartford, CT and the article is about his creation and implementation of an RVI program in these challenging times—and he did it in four days! He was able to accomplish this using his professional network and several NFPA resources, including the NFPA white paper, Conducting Video Inspections, and the proposed NFPA 915, Standard on Remote Inspections. Tim, like many others I have heard from, had been skeptical about the idea of RVIs, believing that they “would reduce the quality of an inspection in an effort to move projects forward.” Current conditions are leaving AHJs no choice but to provide new solutions, like the RVI program in West Hartford. A few weeks into this new way of working, Tim is less concerned than he once was, because quality has not decreased. He said, “We have set good guidelines and are working on checklists that will help ensure the quality.” Some of these solutions may become permanent—in West Hartford they are collecting and using data to help inform decisions moving forward and to help them adjust how they are implementing the RVI service. Here are the 12 key points that I have heard in talking with and listening to AHJs about the opportunity to utilize RVIs in their area: Make sure to stay on top of and follow all CDC guidance related to COVID-19. Focus on making people feel comfortable and safe. These are unprecedented times for everyone, and you never know what external factors people are dealing with. For your staff, this might mean allowing them to voice their concerns for consideration before any changes are put into effect. For your customers, it might mean thinking about them as people first and customers second. Every jurisdiction is different. Different sizes, different budgets, different technology. But there is a lot to be learned from one another right now. Small jurisdictions can learn from large jurisdictions on the opposite coast and vice versa. Be comfortable knowing that the choices you make now may be temporary as you bridge this unexpected gap in your processes. If you spend too much time on every detail, you might not get anything out the door. When you want to mobilize quickly, you need to simplify. Executing a process now doesn't mean you're committing to it long term. You're creating a program to meet current conditions—it may or may not fit how you work typically or how you want to work in the future. Don't start skipping steps in your processes; doing so will likely be detrimental in the long run. Make sure to document everything you're doing and what the outcomes are. This will help you to adjust now and inform policies and processes well into the future. Many places allow inspections using multiple technologies/platforms. I have heard of people using FaceTime, Facebook Live, Google Duo, Microsoft Teams, Skype, WhatsApp, and Zoom. Make sure your employees and your customers are well trained in and understand the process you'll be using. Remote Video Inspections do not mean easier inspections—the expectation is that the pass/fail rate of in-person inspections and RVIs should be the same. Take your time when doing the remote inspection. It's ok to ask someone to slow down, to show a different angle, to measure again, to pan out, or anything else you need them to do to ensure you're comfortable with what you're seeing. RVIs tend to take longer than in-person inspections but are expected to deliver efficiency, primarily in a reduction in the time and associated costs of traveling to and from job sites. (This is a good one to track some data on, if you can.) Questions will come up, many of them relating to managing required physical artifacts when working remotely (e.g., raised seals on paperwork, stickers that need to be affixed, etc.), and that's fine. You'll need a temporary solution in these cases, such as verifying things by phone or video. Just make sure that everyone knows the process. Things are changing, and we all need to adapt and be flexible. But that doesn't mean trading on fire and life safety. To help, NFPA recently produced a fact sheet that provides guidance on how to conduct an RVI. When it comes to RVIs, what are you doing? What questions do you have? How can NFPA help? NFPA has relevant resources designed to keep you informed about important fire, building, and life safety guidance during this pandemic period. NFPA codes and standards are also available for free online access. The International Code Council (ICC) is offering information on health and safety considerations for code officials during COVID-19 too.

Latest Articles